Skip to main content

Revision of PBM Law Sails Through House Without Opposition

HB 2388 makes a previous law regulating PBMs more effective and gives state regulators the ability to police bad actors who violate the law.
April 5, 2017

The House unanimously passed legislation Wednesday morning to better regulate pharmacy benefit managers, giving enforcement powers to the Oregon Department of Consumer & Business Services, designed to ensure the PBMs act lawfully and treat pharmacists fairly.

Rep. Rob Nosse, D-Portland, sponsored House Bill 2388, a policy area he inherited from his predecessor, Rep. Jules Bailey, D-Portland, an economist who later served on the Multnomah County Commission.

“He started working on PBMs because he was unable to fill a prescription for his wife at a local chain pharmacy that was having a dispute with its pharmacy benefit manager,” Nosse said, referring to a battle royale between Walgreen’s and Express Scripts over fair payment.

As Nosse explained, pharmacy benefit managers started as third-party claims administrators that health insurance companies hired to handle claims submitted by pharmacists. But they have grown to some of the largest and most profitable companies in the U.S. healthcare industry as they have gained the ability to negotiate prices directly with pharmaceutical companies.

The prices PBMs get from pharmaceutical companies can differ widely from the price that pharmacists pay for their drugs, and PBMs generate profit from that difference. Pharmacists have complained that PBMs often reimburse them below cost.

HB 2388 and previous legislation don’t guarantee profitability for pharmacies, but the regulations do attempt to prevent PBMs from conducting frivolous audits and the previous law required PBMs to be more transparent.

At least one PBM, CVS Caremark, worked with pharmacists and state regulators to reach an agreement that amends the PBM law that was enacted in 2013. Pharmacists complained that the 2013 law was ineffective, however, because it did not generate enough fees from PBMs or give the state adequate means to enforce the law.

The bill gives DCBS the authority to revoke a PBM’s registration if it violates the law. It also carves out a new exception to public records law, allowing the documentation that DCBS receives in the midst of a suspension to be kept private.

“This was a long walk and we are so pleased to have arrived at the end of this trail," said Niki Terzieff, the lobbyist for the Oregon State Pharmacy Association. "Pharmacies, big and small, urban and rural, family owned and chains, will now have an increased ability to focus on what they do best: provide healthcare to Oregonians.”

Reach Chris Gray at [email protected].


Submitted by Margin O'Error on Thu, 04/06/2017 - 11:30 Permalink

This Bill enables DCBS to audit PBM's and to rescind their license for criminal conduct. OK. A license can be revoked for fraud or criminal conduct without this legislation. It helps the pharmacies. OK.

But what about the real issue: the soaring costs of drugs to consumers?  This bill does nothing about it. Why aren't our legislators doing something about the real issue we all face?