Health care costs to the state can be reduced $3.2 billion over five years

Oregon Health Policy Board hears testimony showing substantial reduced costs to the state as communities begin planning for new way of delivering health care
By: 
Oregon Health Authority

January 10, 2012 -- Oregon is moving forward toward implementing a new way of business for the Oregon Health Plan that will bring better care and lower costs, according to testimony today before the Oregon Health Policy Board about Coordinated Care Organizations (CCOs).

Coordinated Care Organizations were created with strong bipartisan support through House Bill 3650 last year to improve the health care delivery system for low-income Oregonians. Under the legislation, a final implementation proposal will be reviewed in the coming February session.

Conservative estimates show that, pending final approval by lawmakers in February, CCOs could save Oregon more than $1 billion in state and federal dollars over the next three years and more than $3 billion over five years, according to financial projections presented by independent consultants Health Management Associates today. If local communities move to the Coordinated Care Model faster, the cost reductions to the state would come earlier.

“Coordinated Care Organizations give local health systems the tools they need to shift the focus from the emergency room and acute care to prevention, early intervention and chronic disease management. With bold movement forward we will get improved health and the cost reductions that we know will follow,” says Governor John Kitzhaber. “Next month we will send the implementation plan to the Legislature and upon approval will be ready to move quickly to make this vision a reality.”

Today OHP clients statewide must navigate among 15 managed care organizations, nine mental health organizations and eight dental care organizations. As proposed by HB 3650, CCOs are local health entities that deliver health care and coverage for people eligible for Medicaid. Each would have a single point of accountability for health outcomes and have one budget that grows at a fixed rate for behavioral, physical and ultimately dental care.

“It is clear there are substantial cost reductions that come from delivering more coordinated and patient-centered care,” says OHPB chair Eric Parsons. “The sooner we take action, the sooner we can begin stemming the spiraling cost of health care.”

Across the state, health systems are beginning to make plans for Coordinated Care Organizations.

Speaking before the board, George Brown, M.D., spoke about unprecedented cooperation among major health systems in the metro region to pull together a Coordinated Care Organization. Brown is CEO of Legacy Health and represents the newly formed Tri-County Medicaid Collaborative.

“This is the first time all these health care entities have worked together in a coordinated way with one unifying goal, and that is both unique and groundbreaking,” Brown told the board. “We all know that the current system is unsustainable and inaction is not an option. We are committed to transforming the health care system in this region to better serve our community.”

Since the passage of HB 3650, health system representatives from Lane County, Southern Oregon and Central Oregon have also presented to the board their efforts to work in new kinds of partnerships under Coordinated Care Organizations.

As the board finalizes the implementation proposal, state officials are working with the U.S. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services on federal waivers that will allow CCOs the flexibility to manage care for the best health outcomes. Officials are also discussing the possibility of financial investments from the federal government in anticipation of future cost reductions.

The meeting today opens the final round of public comment on the CCO implementation proposal before it is sent to the Legislature for final approval. The proposal can be reviewed and commented on at www.health.oregon.gov.



Comments Welcome

If you'd like to submit a comment on any of the stories that appear in The Lund Report, you'll need to become a subscriber and share your name and email address with us.

You can also send us story tips anonymously.

I have been a supporter of the Lund Report because I viewed it as an independent, investigative source of information. If the Lund report is simply acting as a source of propaganda for a governmental agency then something is terribly wrong with what you are doing. If you are not questioning claims of enormous savings from this new model then you are not doing the job that we expect of you. I applaud the goals of the CCO, I personally support a single payer model but the system proposed by the OHA and the immediate savings projected are largely pie-in-the-sky-when-we-die thinking. The promising results experienced by Mosaic Medical in Central Oregon, while real and exciting, can not be reasonably extrapolated across the entire system, year over year. This is the kind of thing that gives statistics a bad name.

In the short term the system needs an infusion of cash in the form of higher taxes on corporations and the wealthy in order to keep it afloat for integration cost savings to show up.

The Lund Report intends to remain an investigative and independent source of information about Oregon's healthcare system. However, as editor, I believe it's also important that we publish press releases from other sources such as the Oregon Health Authority, and allow our readers to decide the value of such information.
Diane Lund-Muzikant
Editor

I hope working-class acupuncture networks and other thousand-year-trials carers will be included in CCO implementation.

Many Oregonians refuse to work with conventional practitioners unless those practitioners have proven ability to cooperate with trusted carers from ancient practices such as U.S. First Peoples, Ayurveda, and Traditional Chinese Medicine.

Excluding traditions with longer trials and longer experience with personal, personalized, N=1 medicine leaves people out of care-loops if they are carried to a hospital after traumatic injury.

I know this from personal experience. I happened to mention a trusted friend who placed clinical students at a trauma center, as I faded in and out of consciousness. Since the social worker called in to try to make sense out of me knew my friend, I was able to have friends present to watch over my care in the ICU.

Not everybody will luck out the way I did, in our present situation, but we could make it more likely.

Every time somone develops a new widget they show studies projecting great cost savings. Most recent example is electronic health records- no evidence they decrease costs and definite evidence they decrease physician "productivity" by 15-25%. It is easy to predict something will theoretically save money but I am extremely doubtful. There are some duplicative medical practices but despite my working with patients over months and years, very few exercise more, very few eat better and very few get the right amount of hydration and sleep. CCOs are unlikely to save money. However, they may improve outcomes and communication. Any money savings is likely to take decades to show up.

This story is a press release issued by the Oregon Health Authority, and The Lund Report has a separate section for such information. 

Diane Lund-Muzikant

Editor

The Lund Report

 

the OHA now is wrting content for the Lund Report?

© Copyright 2011 by The Lund Report | Privacy Policy Development by: Roger Leigh | Design by:  Parachute Strategies